Discourse map!
< Next Topic | Back to topic list | Previous Topic >
Posted by Amontillado
Dec 15, 2022 at 07:01 PM
That model of infinite canvas with objects on it goes back for years in Numbers.
Much more flexible for my needs than Excel. That’s a personal preference, of course.
Posted by Amontillado
Dec 15, 2022 at 07:02 PM
Hi, ShiJianhui,
How do you find the new release of Tinderbox? I haven’t had time to use it yet.
ShiJianhui wrote:
Do you mean something like this?—> https://imgur.com/a/IRD6Zz1
>Hiding ‘actual content’ is a default setting, you can change it.
>You may find this topic interesting:
>https://forum.eastgate.com/t/literature-review-with-tinderbox/5721
>
>
>Dellu wrote:
>
>>Can you draw maps like this using
>>Tinderbox?https://medium.com/@reorx/a-look-into-heptabases-split-writing-experience-87f9c2bfb257
>>
>>No, you cannot. Tinderbox hides the actual content under the
>>title/folder, unless you want to write paragraphs of content on the
>>Title itself; which will lead you to complicated problems, if possible
>>at all.
>>
>>Tinderbox is good for database kind of stuff.
>>
>>But, for figuring out lines of argumentation, that I described at the
>>beginning, there are better tools. Scapple or Moro, or Heptabase or
>>scrintal let you figure of conceptual flows in a couple of minutes with
>>ease so that you will use your valuable time for actual productive
>work.
>>
>>
>>
Posted by ShiJianhui
Dec 16, 2022 at 07:52 AM
Hi!
I have encountered only one bug so far, I think 9.5 is a pretty solid update. For me, the most useful features of the new update are efficient image storage (no more need for workarounds!) and ‘Longform Writing’ that ‘lets you select any notes you like and view them as a continuous document’. I haven’t try new action code, as I don’t need it for my work.
Amontillado wrote:
Hi, ShiJianhui,
>
>How do you find the new release of Tinderbox? I haven’t had time to use
>it yet.
>
Posted by MadaboutDana
Dec 16, 2022 at 01:47 PM
It does indeed. The trouble is, the concept of “spreadsheet” has been dominated by first Lotus, then Microsoft Excel for so long, the novel approach adopted by Apple totally failed to impinge on general awareness (despite a bunch of brilliant templates provided with Numbers as a matter of course, which clearly show the underlying object-oriented model).
Amontillado wrote:
That model of infinite canvas with objects on it goes back for years in
>Numbers.
>
>Much more flexible for my needs than Excel. That’s a personal
>preference, of course.
>
>