Search for block based apps with graph view!
< Next Topic | Back to topic list | Previous Topic >
Posted by Amontillado
Sep 3, 2022 at 11:50 AM
Obsidian is cool. I’ve got it on a crash-and-burn box.
I wish the graph view had a configurable limit. I’ve seen situations where a document one hop from the current center is off-screen while documents more hops away are in view.
If there was a way to set a maximum number of hops from the current focus, re-mapping each time I clicked on a new node, that would be awesome.
Posted by Daly de Gagne
Sep 3, 2022 at 12:57 PM
Thanks Dr Andus.
Daly
Dr Andus wrote:
Daly de Gagne wrote:
>Hi Dr Andus - would the graph and other features in Obsidian be any
>>better for Sarah’s purposes? I’m curious as I am trying to make my mind
>>up whether to go with Obsidian or Logseq. Thanks.
>
>Hi Daly,
>sorry, can’t comment on Obsidian, as I’ve never tried it. But Roam and
>its clones such as Logseq operate on a fundamentally different priciple
>as far as I understand it, so it comes down to whether your smallest
>unit is a piece of text (for which Obsidian seems better) or a bullet
>point (block or line) in an outline, which is how Roam, Logseq etc.
>work.
>
>I don’t use Roam for writing or organising pieces of texts, so for me
>bullet level data is more important. Essentially Roam type apps allow
>you to link to information contained in bullet points (the basic
>building block), and it has all kinds of features to find and reference
>bullet level information (such as automatic backlinks etc.).
>
>I use Roam essentially as a todo system and as a space for daily todo
>management and execution (at the end of the day each of my Roam day
>pages reflect exactly what I did during that day, with any incomplete
>actions moved forward into the future - this is a bullet journal type
>manual process).
>
>capacities.io looks good, though it seems it hasn’t reached feature
>parity with Roam yet. It does look like a Roam type app though.