Forum Posts Feed
Walling
< Next Topic | Back to topic list | Previous Topic >
Posted by Amontillado
Aug 26, 2024 at 05:37 PM
Agreed, Obsidian’s extensibility is cool.
It seems a little complex to write an extension, though, and that is what draws me toward Tinderbox. It’s pretty easy to write agents.
I confess I’m not a faithful Tinderbox user, though. I should revisit it.
tberni wrote:
>I consider Obsidian’s case to be special. Its architecture that supports
>plug-ins makes it an operating system within an operating system, so
>that it becomes an open writing environment for multiple systems,
>methods, and work environments focused on text and data management. I
>think we can even talk about a new management and work paradigm.
Posted by tberni
Aug 26, 2024 at 07:18 PM
Amontillado wrote:
>I confess I’m not a faithful Tinderbox user, though. I should revisit it.
This is exactly what happens to me as well: I come and go with Tinderbox. I leave it for certain periods and then come back to it based on a specific project I have in hand. Little by little I am getting deeper into it, but it requires dedication.
It occurs to me that a simplified version (map view, outliner and little else) of Tinderbox for iOS/iPadOS would be very welcome, as it would make light work easier (data collection, schematization, etc.) and perhaps facilitate its dissemination.