Omni roadmap (OmniOutliner on life support)
< Next Topic | Back to topic list | Previous Topic >
Pages: < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 > Last ›
Posted by rafael costacurta
Jan 31, 2020 at 05:33 PM
Windows version ߘͰߘͰߘ
tightbeam wrote:
Or a Windows version…
>
>Paul Korm wrote:
>Good point. macOS-only is a significant limitation for this kind of
>>application.
>>
>>Skywatcher wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>SheetPlanner wrote:
>>>
>>>>T
>>>>2.0 will be a huge and free update in April or May.
>>>>
>>>>Thanks,
>>>>Peter
>>>>
>>>
>>>Any plans for an iOS version ?
Posted by SheetPlanner
Jan 31, 2020 at 05:59 PM
Hugh,
Thanks for being a customer. We appreciate your business.
Good point, there are definitely use cases that SheetPlanner is better suited for and vice versa but we do plan to keep enhancing SheetPlanner such that its use cases expand and it becomes a key application for many types of user data.
In the 2.0 release where we allow users to organize multiple sheets in a single document you will see the start of this journey as people centralize multiple outlines and later other types of data….
Peter
Hugh wrote:
>
>SheetPlanner wrote:
>Hey Bob,
>>I have not done a comparative analysis of Omni Outliner and
>SheetPlanner
>>but from my perspective the Outlining capabilities of SP are pretty
>>robust.
>>
>>Are there specific features in OO that you would like to see in SP?
>>
>>Peter
>
>>
>>
>>Bob Spies wrote:
>>So you’re representing SheetPlanner as an alternative to OmniOutliner?
>>>From your promotional material and the reviews I’ve read, it looks to
>>me
>>>like an innovative project planning tool with some simple outlining
>>>capabilities, but not an industrial strength outliner like
>>OmniOutliner.
>
>I own licences for both SheetPlanner and OmniOutliner. In my view they
>are both excellent at what they do best. But what they do best are two
>different things. I would not for example want to use SP for outlining a
>novel or a long feature article (together with all sorts of annotations)
>prior to putting the outline into Scrivener, Ulysses or Word. I would
>also not want to use OO to plan the scheduling of the writing of that
>novel, chapter by chapter, or that feature article, section by section
>(or for that matter, the timeline of a fictional narrative or a factual
>argument). But I might well use SP for such purposes.
Posted by SheetPlanner
Jan 31, 2020 at 06:01 PM
Skywatcher,
We plan to begin on iOS development after this years WWDC.
Thanks,
Peter
Skywatcher wrote:
>
>SheetPlanner wrote:
>
>>T
>>2.0 will be a huge and free update in April or May.
>>
>>Thanks,
>>Peter
>>
>
>Any plans for an iOS version ?
Posted by SheetPlanner
Jan 31, 2020 at 06:03 PM
Tightbeam,
We will have to get iOS completed before considering a Windows app….
Peter
tightbeam wrote:
Or a Windows version…
>
>Paul Korm wrote:
>Good point. macOS-only is a significant limitation for this kind of
>>application.
>>
>>Skywatcher wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>SheetPlanner wrote:
>>>
>>>>T
>>>>2.0 will be a huge and free update in April or May.
>>>>
>>>>Thanks,
>>>>Peter
>>>>
>>>
>>>Any plans for an iOS version ?
Posted by Amontillado
Feb 1, 2020 at 11:27 PM
One thing I’ve found limiting with OmniFocus is everything goes in out database. I like to have separate task/to-do lists. For instance, if I’m working on a technical document, it’s nice to have a separate to-do list just for it. I know I need to work on it, I don’t need 20 to-do tasks in my main task list. I prefer a to-do file in the file folder (or Devonthink file) for the project.
Also, a long time ago I was so desperate for a timeline utility, I bought the overpriced Timeline Maker Pro application. It was OK, and I liked the spreadsheet event entry it featured. I moved from there to Aeon Timeline, which I’ve had good luck with - but I don’t use it often.
Sheetplanner looks like it could handle both my timeline and my task list needs. It sure looks nice.