Forum Posts Feed
Tinderbox / content visualization software for windows?
< Next Topic | Back to topic list | Previous Topic >
Posted by Amontillado
Aug 28, 2018 at 01:08 PM
Paul J. Miller wrote:
>I don’t know what it is about ConnectedText which lends itself to the
>data communicating with the user but this is my experience. See
>https://luhmann.surge.sh/communicating-with-slip-boxes for a better
>explanation of this phenomenon than I could possibly give.
That essay about slip boxes is pretty interesting. I started down the path of structuring my brain drippings with Writers Blocks, and graduated from there to more fluid methods. One thing I’ve learned is that exposition, whether fiction or not, is a linear exercise that lends itself to hierarchical structure. An outline is like a list of goals and subgoals. What I’m going to say and its subunits, in the order I’m going to achieve the milestones.
Notes are different, best viewed as a navigable rat’s nest, with heavy emphasis on the navigation.
I was blown away by The Brain, basically by two things. The jump thoughts which were more important to me than the parent-child-sibling hierarchy, and the plex view, which was like a limited context with escape routes. It fits me and my vulnerability to context switching and doorway effect.
The Brain lost some nodes for me once, probably due to Java trouble (and kudos to The Brain for getting away from Java). Along the way I moved over to Mac systems, and discovered DevonThink.
DevonThink is wonderful, but at first it seemed like losing the jump thought/plex view was a personal tragedy.
Now, though, I think of tags as my jump links, and there is a bit more to them than that.
When I add a tag to a note, I try not to think of making a tag that describes an attribute of the note as much as I think about how the tag will relate to other, future, notes that will get the tag. A tag, then, reveals what The Brain would have shown as a collection of jump thoughts. A second tag on the same note reveals something The Brain doesn’t have, a second collection of jump thoughts.
Having a hierarchy of tags lets me adjust the focus of which thoughts I want to jump to, and discovering I could replicate a tag was a great revelation. Now notes about Bad Bart could fit under Mass Murderers for his taste for blood, and under needlepoint for his cross stitch passions.
Anyway, it’s good to think about how logic is formed as well as what logical discoveries we can make. Efficient study is names, dates, places, and epistemology.
When I realized tags could fill in for jump thoughts, DevonThink became more useful. Realizing that The Brain organizes as two hierarchies, parent-child-sibling and jump relations, led me to think of tags as forming multiple hierarchies. Replication serves in a similar capacity to The Brain’s adept use of circular references when you want them.
In other words, I suppose, anything used for information management is more useful with some thought as to how to organize.
The slip box article was nice.
Posted by Andy Brice
Aug 28, 2018 at 05:35 PM
It may be worth looking at Hyper Plan. It has Windows and Mac versions. The Professional edition allows you to make any number of types of connections between cards. You can automatically layout cards by their properties or connectivity.
—
Andy Brice
https://www.hyperplan.com
Posted by Paul Korm
Aug 28, 2018 at 06:12 PM
@Andy Brice—nice thought, but Hyperplan doesn’t really work well for me with note taking and content or context mapping. It doesn’t fit into the category of software discussed in this thread. Just my opinion.
@Amontillado—very interesting reply. Thank you. DEVONthink isn’t a contender when it comes to visualization, but you’re right about tagging—when used thoughtfully as you describe DEVONthink tagging can be quite useful. Coupled with DEVONthink’s powerful search and “see also” capabilities, a good case is to apply a tag on the fly to a group of search results to create a temporary relationship among those results. Later on when that relationship is no longer needed, the tag can be deleted without disturbing any other tagging.
Posted by Alexander Deliyannis
Aug 28, 2018 at 07:05 PM
thouqht wrote:
>I’m looking for a note management software that would allow me plop down
>hundreds of notes and build as many different connections between them
>as I want. Ideally, I could then visualize those connections in
>different ways. I create educational content on complex ideas and I need
>a way to move around a bunch of different information so that I can
>identify the ideal structure for delivery.
Assuming that the information is in English, I would personally use Brainstorm* even at this day and age (it has not been updated in several years). I stress that this is a personal solution, and not one without issues, but bear with me as I explain the logic behind my rather outdated approach in case you find it useful.
Content-wise, Brainstorm is plain text (one can colour whole paragraphs, but that’s all). It works in permanent ‘hoist’ mode, showing only the current level and the single entry above it. It is possible to open several windows to display different views of the same file (‘Model’ in Brainstorm terminology.)
One can collect or type text entries to their heart’s content and worry about organisation later. This can then be done using several tools, including buckets (‘Throw’ to ‘Marks’), drag-n-drop, and cloning (‘Namesakes’).
It is this latter feature that I find unsurpassable: other programmes have clones, but Brainstorm is the only programme I am aware of (along with the humble, and also no longer developed, Zulupad personal wiki) which can identify namesakes on its own.
So let’s say that I’m typing a list of topics, if I type one that already exists somewhere in the model (as an independent entry, not as part of a paragraph), Brainstorm will recognise it, light up, and include below it all existing subsidiary information. With the left and right arrows one can slide between the various namesakes wherever they may be, identifying related info along the way.
Brainstorm allows one to focus on structure (hierarchy, order, association, etc.) at the immediate level, while the overall structure slowly arises. There is a ‘balloon’ view-only mode to assess the whole hierarchy. This is a classic outline so, if there are namesakes, these will appear in multiple positions in the outline, with their subsidiary hierarchies repeating each time. The structures can be exported as OPML or indented text files.
A point of caution: while visual tools may seem more attractive and make structure more immediately evident, I have rarely seen them perform well at scale, i.e., with hundreds of entries.
* Find it at http://brainstormsw.com/ Click on the “Quick and dirty demo” link at the top right for, well, a quick and dirty demo.
Posted by Alexander Deliyannis
Aug 29, 2018 at 06:31 AM
Paul Korm wrote:
@Andy Brice—nice thought, but Hyperplan doesn’t really work well for
>me with note taking and content or context mapping. It doesn’t fit
>into the category of software discussed in this thread. Just my
>opinion.
Actually, I believe that the new ‘relationship mapping’ feature introduced to Hyperplan in v.281 https://www.hyperplan.com/hyperplan_v281.html might well make sense for the kind of task described in this thread. And Hyperplan is one of the few visual programmes that works well in scale.