Forum Posts Feed
mac emulators
< Next Topic | Back to topic list | Previous Topic >
Posted by David Dunham
Mar 13, 2008 at 03:27 AM
Chris Thompson wrote:
>It almost doesn’t count… that’s like emulating Windows 3.1 ;) The only outliner you
>can run in those emulators is the old, but still feature rich, MORE.
Um, what about Acta? http://a-sharp.com/opal/acta.html
Posted by Derek Cornish
Mar 13, 2008 at 05:39 PM
Chris commented:
> There’s no Mac emulator, but if you’re willing to hunt around on the seedier side of the internet, through hacks you can install OS X on generic PCs.
Coincidentally, I’d been doing exactly the same thing, motivated by the desire to try out Scrivener. All pretty illegal, IMHO. For a procedure that verges on the legal - but probably isn’t - have a look at:
http://pcwizcomputer.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=36&Itemid=32
It uses a legal (i.e. bought and unhacked) MAC OS X, and VMWare’s Workstation 6. From comments elsewhere on the web, however, it looks as though, while OS X can be purchased separate from MAC hardware, it can only legally be run on such hardware. Workarounds - like putting an Apple sticker on your PC - don’t qualify…
All the same, if it can be done - and it looks as though it can - it’s probably only a question of time before it can be done legally. Given that XP and Vista can be run on MAC’s running OS X, pressure is going to build for some reciprocity - I hope.
Derek
Posted by Chris Thompson
Mar 13, 2008 at 06:15 PM
I don’t think the technique you posted in that link works with an unhacked copy of OS X. They’re using “JaS Mac OS X 10.4.8 Intel/AMD SSE2 SSE3 PPF1+PPF2”, a hacked copy of the 10.4.8 kernel. I was under the impression unhacked versions of OS X cannot be virtualized.
—Chris
Chris commented:
>http://pcwizcomputer.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=36&Itemid=32
>It uses a legal (i.e. bought and unhacked) MAC OS X, and VMWare’s Workstation 6. From comments elsewhere on the web, >however, it looks as though, while OS X can be purchased separate from MAC hardware, it can only legally be run on such >hardware.
Posted by Derek Cornish
Mar 14, 2008 at 04:01 PM
Posted by Chris Thompson
Mar 13, 2008 at 06:15 PM
> I don’t think the technique you posted in that link works with an unhacked copy of OS X. They’re using “JaS Mac OS X > 10.4.8 Intel/AMD SSE2 SSE3 PPF1+PPF2”, a hacked copy of the 10.4.8 kernel. I was under the impression unhacked > versions of OS X cannot be virtualized.
Yes, you’re right. From the author’s write-up I had assumed that he was only using the hacked copy for convenience, but in fact the original OS X DVD just won’t work in that scenario. Of course, there are practicable but tortuous ways of patching one’s own legally-bought copy of OS X, but that’s another matter (though it still wouldn’t be legal!). Thanks for pointing this out.
Derek
Posted by Derek Cornish
Mar 14, 2008 at 04:54 PM
Manfred -
Doesn’t the PearPC emulator count? http://www.windowsdevcenter.com/pub/a/windows/2005/01/18/PearPC.html
This seems to be able to run Tiger (and possibly Leopard) - and from original MAC OS DVDs without the hacking needed when using the virtualization method (see elsewhere on this thread).
Again, mentioned only for sake of completeness. The original developer seems to have stopped working on it, although others are building on it.
Derek