CRIMP Alert: A Compiled List of PDF Managing and Search Tools
< Next Topic | Back to topic list | Previous Topic >
Posted by Dominik Holenstein
Jan 23, 2008 at 07:53 AM
I have done a short web reasearch for PDF managing and search tools.
You can find the compiled list here. I am sure this list is not complete:
filehand
http://www.filehand.com/
It’s free now.
docuquest
http://www.docuquest.com/Index.htm
Pricing reduced from US$ 200 to US$ 30
archivarius
http://www.likasoft.com
Sleuthhound PDF Search
http://www.isleuthhound.com/sleuthhound/download_pdf_search.php
PDF Search Assistant
http://www.search-pdf.com/solutions.htm
Advanced PDF Manager
http://www.manage-pdf.com/
US$ 95
Search Inform Desktop
http://www.searchinform.com/search-site/en/main/full-text-search-products-searchinform-desktop.html
dtSearch
http://www.dtsearch.com/
Expensive: US$ 199
ISYS Desktop
http://www.isys-search.com/products/desktop/index.html
PDF Explorer
http://homepage.oniduo.pt/pdfe/pdfe.html
€ 60
Happy testing!
Dominik
Posted by Alexander Deliyannis
Feb 6, 2008 at 04:27 PM
I can’t say that I tried all of the tools listed, but after trialing Archivarius I went ahead and registered it. It’s very fast and works very well with Greek (as long as a multitude of other languages).
Archivarius will take quite a bit of your drive because it stores text versions of the files it indexes. The benefit is that you can view its findings from within the program without opening the actual file (or even having access to it, as it may be on a disconected network drive). Once you know what you want, double clicking will open the original file.
Brilliant!
alx
Posted by Derek Cornish
Feb 7, 2008 at 04:20 AM
Dominik,
Thanks very much for these; I’ve been meaning to say that for some time.
It is very difficult to decide how best to handle pdf files - whether to leave them in their Windows folders and index and search them, or to keep them within specialized container programs (many of which don’t do a very good job of searching them, but at least keep them tidily in one location).
Derek
Posted by Derek Cornish
Feb 7, 2008 at 05:59 AM
Alexander Deliyannis wrote:
>
>Archivarius will take quite a bit of your drive
>because it stores text versions of the files it indexes. The benefit is that you can
>view its findings from within the program without opening the actual file (or even
>having access to it, as it may be on a disconected network drive). Once you know what you
>want, double clicking will open the original file.
>
>Brilliant!
>alx
>
This is how Redree’s recently retired “Wilbur” freeware indexed search software [http://wilbur.redtree.com/ ] handles pdf files, too.The text versions of the pdf files are kept in a folder under “My Documents”. I think it is probably how most programs using pdftotext.exe work, although I can’t speak for Archivarius.
Redtree is now developing a new freeware program, named Wilma, which is still in beta [http://wilma.redtree.com/en/help/index.html]. To quote the developer: “The current version makes use of the multiplatform capabilities of RealBasic to provide native desktop interfaces for Linux, Mac and Windows machines, while C++ is used for the core functionality.”
Wilma does not use the Windows system registry. It doesn’t work on WIN98 or ME (but Wilbur still works on WIN9x and XP). Wilma may work on Vista - I don’t know. Since the focus of its developer in on Linux, information about how to use pdftotext as one of its external analyzers on Windows tends to be rather sparce. Consequently I am still using Wilbur, which was designed for Windows.
Derek
Posted by Alexander Deliyannis
Feb 7, 2008 at 08:33 AM
Derek Cornish wrote:
>It is very difficult to decide how best to handle pdf files - whether to leave them in
>their Windows folders and index and search them, or to keep them within specialized
>container programs (many of which don’t do a very good job of searching them, but at
>least keep them tidily in one location).
I have little difficulty in deciding myself. I have always opted for leaving them in (a few) permanent windows folders and indexing/linking to them from database programs such as UltraRecall or whatever. The sheer size of the files is such that it would make no sense to include them _within_ a file.
For me PDFs fall into the greater category of media files, which includes image and audio files, as well as video which I barely use. I have a folder called Library (with various subfolders) with all my electronic versions of books and related references. My PDFs alone are several hundreds of megabytes. My audiobooks are several gigabytes.
Apart for the size issue, I believe that files as such will be accesible for quite some time, whereas database programs come and go. Think of the time involved in importing such files to a database and then exporting them to one’s next information manager.
That said, information is not knowledge. A library of references makes little sense unless one invests in slowly building their comprehension of the ideas within that material, i.e. their knowledge, whether visually (with mind maps etc) or textually (with a classic outliner). For this I find many of the tools we discuss in this forum absolutely invaluable.
An indexing program complements the building of such an ‘idea structure’ by helping reference and support themes, once one knows what they are after. Personally, I was attracted to Archivarius by its support for an amazing multitude of file formats, as well as for my own working language which is often unsupported by anglosaxon made/oriented software.
Cheers
alx