Forum Posts Feed
MaxThink
< Next Topic | Back to topic list | Previous Topic >
Posted by Bob Mackreth
Nov 16, 2007 at 07:53 PM
Thanks, Graham - I missed that.
Graham Rhind wrote:
>I noticed this on the download page Bob:
>
>“Note: If running “InstallMaxthink.exe”
>loads another program, erase “setup.lst” from your download directory, then rerun
>“InstallMaxthink.exe”.”
>
>Graham
>
>Bob Mackreth wrote:
>>I downloaded the
>installer, but rather than installing MaxThink, it tried to install
>>“Essentials
>Codec Pack.”
>>
>>What’s with this? Anyone else have this happen?
Posted by GeorgeB
Nov 17, 2007 at 12:05 PM
I saw all of the positive reviews about MaxThink on the MaxThink website so I gave MaxThink a try last night. I wasn’t impressed. I prefer NoteMap.
Is MaxThink really the power software for upper level thinking? Am I missing something?
I uninstalled it from my computer.
Posted by Franz Grieser
Nov 17, 2007 at 12:45 PM
>I saw all of the positive reviews about MaxThink on the MaxThink website so I gave
>MaxThink a try last night. I wasn’t impressed. I prefer NoteMap.
I think the reviews relate to Maxthink for DOS - at least that’s what the title in the browser windows (“DOS Version”) and the dates and the price indicate.
>Is MaxThink really
>the power software for upper level thinking? Am I missing something?
That’s exactly what I asked myself after installing the software yesterday and looking through the example file.
When going through the website and the short “videos” (nothing more than simple presentations in Flash format, no screenshots of the software), I thought that there were a number of tools to “help you think”, to structure your writings. But I failed to find that in the software.
It is true: Maxthink comes with 55 questions that will help you produce complete information on any topic. But I thought that would be part of the software - and not only the contents of a Maxthink file.
So, I’d say: It’s a 2-pane outliner, not a idea processor.
Compared to Notemap, Maxthink may have a superior feature set - I haven’t compared them, yet. But the interface is ugly and cramped. The icons are really small, and there is a lot of them in the toolbars. The toolbars are fixed: You cannot remove or rearrange icons, you cannot hide the toolbars or move them. The windows are also fixed - no way to make the left window smaller or wider. There is no hoist command, you cannot open part of the outline in a separate window.
The help file is kind of strange: Don’t expect a how-to explanation. There is a “TOC” but there are no headings and no contents. Through the index you get explanations of the commands - and a lot of practical advice on how to structure and organize data. A nice touch: It’s the only help file that I know of having entries for “Noam Chomsky”, “Socrates” or “Aristotle” in the index. :-)
>I uninstalled
>it from my computer.
At the moment, I cannot see a reason why I would need it. But I’ll keep it installed for a few days.
Franz
Posted by Bob Mackreth
Nov 17, 2007 at 02:08 PM
Franz Grieser wrote:
>I think the
>reviews relate to Maxthink for DOS - at least that’s what the title in the browser
>windows (“DOS Version”) and the dates and the price indicate.
That would explain a lot. If Maxthink were the only outliner around, I would probably think it was a wonderful tool. However, the many shortcomings that Franz correctly points out in its UI and feature set seem to place it below other tools available today.
It does have one significant advantage over NoteMap, though: price. Last time I checked, NoteMap listed for five times the price of Maxthink.
Posted by Stephen R. Diamond
Nov 18, 2007 at 05:55 AM
Franz Grieser wrote:
>>I saw all of the positive reviews about MaxThink on the MaxThink website so I gave
>
>>MaxThink a try last night. I wasn’t impressed. I prefer NoteMap.
>
>I think the
>reviews relate to Maxthink for DOS - at least that’s what the title in the browser
>windows (“DOS Version”) and the dates and the price indicate.
>
>>Is MaxThink really
>
>>the power software for upper level thinking? Am I missing something?
>
>That’s
>exactly what I asked myself after installing the software yesterday and looking
>through the example file.
I’d suggest exploring the commands ‘Binsort,’ ‘Categorize’ [which I mistakenly called ‘Classify’ in a previous post], ‘Fence,’ and ‘Levelize.’ Try them out, read the indexed descriptions and the cross-refences.
To take an example: wouldn’t it be useful to efficiently set up a handful of categories and efficiently assign all of a long list of topics to its proper bin? This is what Binsort does.