Forum Posts Feed
Surfulater PrevGen on bits, again
< Next Topic | Back to topic list | Previous Topic >
Posted by 22111
Jan 19, 2014 at 05:40 PM
To not “only feed you stones”, like the Germans say: Any representation of “lateral thinking”, of “associative thinking”, or of “straigt/consecutive thinking” (i.e. the “logical, the “indented”, the “left hemisphere” way, or let’s call it the “public administration at its best” way) presumes two dimensions, i.e. downwards, lateral, but on the same “pane”/plain/level.
Whilst in fact, thinking is “moving” in 3 dimensions, and, “worse,”, concurrently on those, hence the “how many elements can our brain store at the same time” prob, be it 5, 6, 7 for the smartest of thus, be it even just 3 or 2: good thining is a simultaneous move into different directions, and how could current sw or even traditional writing replicate such a thing, since its steps are in succession, how ever you then put that representation on screen or on paper. Our brain is simply too fast and too “entangled” to then make it possible to follow, and any writing-it-down or sw eyewash is just for mechanicizing that “follow” step. We can’t “glue it down”, part of the brain product vanishes in-between.
And not seeing this hampers any sw discussion.