Anyone testing the Omea Pro 2.3 beta?
< Next Topic | Back to topic list | Previous Topic >
Posted by Dominik Holenstein
Apr 24, 2007 at 08:06 PM
I have tested Omea 2.1 or 2.0 and these were the reasons against it:
- too slow
- too resource hungry
- no notes functionality like Ultra Recal or ADM
- you can’t add new fields to items like Tasks
- too many features (yes, really!)
Development for Omea has slowed down since it was released as Open Source.
Dominik
Posted by JJ
Apr 24, 2007 at 08:38 PM
Dominik Holenstein wrote:
>I have tested Omea 2.1 or 2.0 and these were the reasons against it:
>- too slow
>- too
>resource hungry
>- no notes functionality like Ultra Recal or ADM
>- you can’t add new
>fields to items like Tasks
>- too many features (yes, really!)
>
>Development for Omea
>has slowed down since it was released as Open Source.
>
>Dominik
>
Agree with the above BUT newer versions now support notes
-jj
Posted by Ian Goldsmid
Apr 25, 2007 at 12:45 AM
JJ wrote:
>
>
>Dominik Holenstein wrote:
>>I have tested Omea 2.1 or 2.0 and these were the reasons
>against it:
>>- too slow
>>- too
>>resource hungry
>>- no notes functionality like
>Ultra Recal or ADM
>>- you can’t add new
>>fields to items like Tasks
>>- too many
>features (yes, really!)
>>
>>Development for Omea
>>has slowed down since it was
>released as Open Source.
>>
>>Dominik
>>
>
>Agree with the above BUT newer versions now
>support notes
>
>
>-jj
Hi
Latest EA (March 9) also does provide Custom Properties (date, number, text, yes/no) which can be used in searching and views (saved searches)
I also find that the latest version is not slow (yes, the initial indexing is slow - but after that is less resource hungry and more responsive than Outlook [2007])
Ian