Forum Posts Feed
UltraRecall v4 update worth it?
< Next Topic | Back to topic list | Previous Topic >
Pages: ‹ First < 3 4 5 6 7 8 >
Posted by quant
Aug 24, 2009 at 06:05 PM
Daly de Gagne wrote:
>What nonexistent statement.
>
>There was a statement Jan responded to.
>
>He didn’t
>make it up.
Did I say he made it up? I wrote “nonexistent”, you said yourself “there WAS ...”.
English is not my first language, but dictionary tells me
“existent” - adjective formal, existing NOW:
The statement was deleted, it ceased to exist, meaing it didn’t exist AT THE TIME that he kept bringing it up, i.e. was NONEXISTENT. Please correct me if I’m wrong.
Posted by quant
Aug 24, 2009 at 06:22 PM
Stephen Zeoli wrote:
>Just because Kinook removed the statement, doesn’t mean it did not
>exist.
I’m not saying it never existed. I wrote it was nonexistent (at the time the enquiries were made). I thought there was a difference in meaning, maybe there isn’t. If there isn’t, please accept my deepest apologies.
> I read it myself when it was first posted. If the statement was still posted, Jan
>would not have felt the need to bring it up… DO YOU see the difference?
another IF IF IF ...
Posted by quant
Aug 24, 2009 at 06:39 PM
Jan Rifkinson wrote:
>... circumstances, etc & never got an answer. Given the ambiguity of the 2nd statement,
>especially in contrast to the 1st statement, I felt then & feel now that I had a right to
>ask the question. And in fact, I asked it a few times, always courteous & respectful if
>memory serves.
If you didn’t get the answer first, second, third time ... what did you expect when you asked it forth, fifth time? What was your motive for asking it again, knowing that it was not answered several times and it’s probably not going to be answered if you ask it again?
Posted by Jan Rifkinson
Aug 24, 2009 at 09:28 PM
quant wrote:
>
>If you didn’t get the
>answer first, second, third time ... what did you expect when you asked it forth, fifth
>time? What was your motive for asking it again, knowing that it was not answered
>several times and it’s probably not going to be answered if you ask it again?
Only because you’ve asked me a direct question am I even responding to your post. The answer—I repeat—is that this thread is not about me or how Kinook dealt with me. That’s just window dressing.
A poster on this forum asked whether URp v4 was worth the price. I said I didn’t think so & I gave my reasons why. End of story.
Posted by quant
Aug 24, 2009 at 09:45 PM
Jan Rifkinson wrote:
>Only because you’ve asked me a direct question am I
>even responding to your post. The answer—I repeat—is that this thread is not about
>me or how Kinook dealt with me. That’s just window dressing.
>
>A poster on this forum
>asked whether URp v4 was worth the price. I said I didn’t think so & I gave my reasons why.
>End of story.
I said myself in another thread that I was disappointed with v4, in fact I asked on UR forum whether it’s paid upgrade or not. So I’m not doing any “window dressing”. This thread evolved as it evolved, and I think it’s totally irrelevant what the original topic was. But you have the right not to answer my question, and don’t worry, I won’t bring it up in every thread you participate in ;-)