Tree vs. Progressive line-by-line find
Posted by srdiamond15
on 6/2/2005
srdiamond15
6/2/2005 7:42 pm
InSight's (http://www.dataomega.com)progressive find has received little comment here. I wonder if anyone has much tried this kind of find as a complete substitute for a tree.
Most pims do not find line by line, but rather give you a list of topics containing the target string. One exception is Microsoft OneNote, which provides a line-by-line list must like InSight in that it shows the context of each find (albeit without InSight's line numbering. But there's a difference. InSight produces its list of found occurrences instantaneously. OneNote is reasonably fast, but it takes maybe 5 to 10 seconds to complete a search. Other differences that are probably more important is that the InSight search starts when you type the first letters and can be progressively narrowed by additional superimposed searches.
Stephen Diamond
Most pims do not find line by line, but rather give you a list of topics containing the target string. One exception is Microsoft OneNote, which provides a line-by-line list must like InSight in that it shows the context of each find (albeit without InSight's line numbering. But there's a difference. InSight produces its list of found occurrences instantaneously. OneNote is reasonably fast, but it takes maybe 5 to 10 seconds to complete a search. Other differences that are probably more important is that the InSight search starts when you type the first letters and can be progressively narrowed by additional superimposed searches.
Stephen Diamond